Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle holds that eudaimonia—the deepest human flourishing—arises from virtuous activity in accordance with reason, not from passionate intensity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some of life's deepest goods—love, aesthetic experience, moral outrage—involve passionate intensity that reason alone cannot generate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtue without emotional engagement becomes hollow; courage requires fear transformed, not reason devoid of passionate commitment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aristotle himself identifies passionate emotions like proper anger and appropriate joy as components of virtue, not obstacles to it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Reason provides stable, reliable guidance across contexts, while passion fluctuates based on circumstances and bodily states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtuous activity requires deliberation and judgment about means and ends, capacities unique to reason rather than emotion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Eudaimonia means fulfilling our distinctive human function; reason differentiates humans from other animals more than passion does.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.