Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle's akratic agent pursues pleasure against their own rational judgment, which is precisely the condition Epicurus sought to cure, not endorse.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Epicurus's 'rational pleasure-selection' still prioritizes pleasure as the ultimate good, sharing the akratic agent's basic motivational structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Both positions allow pleasure-pursuit to override other values; disagreeing on which pleasures to pursue doesn't cure akrasia itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Epicurus endorsed pursuing pleasures of philosophy and friendship over bodily ones—a preference, not a cure for pursuing against rational judgment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aristotle's akratic agent acts against reasoned judgment; Epicurus advocated rational pleasure-selection, making them fundamentally opposed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Epicurus explicitly warned against pursuing excessive bodily pleasures, positioning himself as a curative against irrational desire-pursuit.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The akratic condition involves weakness of will; Epicureanism aims at self-mastery through rational calculation, directly addressing this problem.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42