Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle's doctrine of essential properties entails that for Socrates to exist as Socrates, his characteristic rational capacities must be actual.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Socrates in deep sleep lacks actual rational activity yet remains Socrates; actuality isn't required.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Aristotle distinguishes essence from exercise; essence can persist while capacities lie dormant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Identity persists through coma or dementia; actual rationality exercised is not identity-constituting.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aristotle defines substance by essential properties that distinguish an entity's nature from accidents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rationality is Socrates' defining characteristic; without it, he becomes merely another animal.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Actual (not merely potential) capacities constitute being; potentiality alone is incomplete existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.