Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle's eudaimonia requires stable virtuous dispositions, which are cultivated through habituation, not open deliberation among alternatives.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Practical wisdom (phronesis) itself requires deliberation about particulars; habituation alone cannot determine right action in novel situations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtuous agents must sometimes reconsider inherited habits when circumstances change, implying deliberation is part of maintaining rather than opposing virtue.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Blind habituation risks ingraining vicious or contextually inappropriate dispositions if initial training lacks reasoned foundations and flexibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtue requires automatic right action without internal conflict, which deliberation about alternatives would undermine by creating hesitation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Habituation builds reliable behavioral patterns through repetition, while deliberation each time leaves room for weakness of will and inconsistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A virtuous person acts from stable character, not from calculating consequences each time, which distinguishes genuine virtue from mere compliance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42