Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle's God achieves the highest activity—self-directed contemplation—without any other mind conferring recognition upon it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Self-contemplation seems circular; thinking about thought without external content may be empty formal activity, not genuine knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's perfection includes omniscience, God must know actual world events; this knowledge requires the world's independent existence, not pure self-reference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Contemplation typically enriches through engagement with otherness; complete isolation from external reality limits rather than maximizes cognitive activity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Self-sufficiency is a mark of perfection; God's independence from external validation demonstrates supreme metaphysical status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Contemplation of oneself requires no external object; God thinking about thought achieves actuality without dependency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Recognition-dependence implies incompleteness; a perfect being cannot require acknowledgment from lesser minds to be fully realized.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.