Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aristotle's law of non-contradiction, often cited as a pa... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Knowledge of first principles is certain

    Aristotle's law of non-contradiction, often cited as a paradigm first principle, was rejected as non-fundamental by Hegel's dialectical logic.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Hegel showed that contradictions can be productive forces in historical development, not logical failures to be eliminated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reality exhibits genuine contradictions (e.g., being and nothingness) that LNC artificially suppresses rather than explains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Dialectical logic better accounts for change and negation than static principle-based systems that assume unchanging essences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Hegel's dialectics relies on LNC to even articulate its claims; rejecting it is self-undermining, not genuinely alternative logic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Confusing conceptual/semantic contradictions with real contradictions in nature doesn't establish that LNC is non-fundamental.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel never actually abandoned LNC systematically; he modified scope and application, not the principle itself fundamentally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked
    Knowledge of first principles is certain

    Related

    Confusing conceptual/semantic contradictions with real contradictions in nature ...Dialectical logic better accounts for change and negation than static principle-...Hegel never actually abandoned LNC systematically; he modified scope and applica...Hegel showed that contradictions can be productive forces in historical developm...
    +3 moreShow less
    Hegel's dialectics relies on LNC to even articulate its claims; rejecting it is ...Knowledge of first principles is certainReality exhibits genuine contradictions (e.g., being and nothingness) that LNC a...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit