Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Aristotle's Physics (VII.1-2) establishes that all motion requires a mover in direct contact, implying relational resistance is intrinsic to any mover-movable pair.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Aristotle's own celestial mechanics posits unmoved movers causing motion without physical contact, contradicting the direct-contact principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim conflates logical dependence (mover causes motion) with physical contact; causation needn't require spatial proximity or touching.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Magnetic attraction and gravitational phenomena occur without contact, suggesting resistance may be relational but not dependent on physical touching.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Aristotle's distinction between potential and actual motion requires an external agent to actualize potentiality, necessitating direct causal contact.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Empirical observation shows all perceptible motion involves contact: pushing, pulling, throwing all require the mover to touch the movable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Resistance inheres in matter itself; any mover must overcome this resistance through direct transmission of force, making contact intrinsic to motion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.