Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle's virtue ethics holds that anger felt at the right time, toward the right person, and in the right degree is itself virtuous.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Emotions arise from automatic neural processes; we cannot consciously control them to match abstract criteria of 'rightness'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtue ethics typically locates virtue in stable character traits, not fleeting emotional episodes; anger is too volatile.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The criteria ('right time, person, degree') are inherently subjective and culturally variable, undermining virtue's universal aspirations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtue requires appropriate emotional responses; anger absent when injustice occurs indicates moral insensitivity or cowardice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Aristotle's mean between extremes applies to anger: deficiency (never angry) and excess (always angry) are both vicious.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Well-calibrated anger motivates necessary corrective action and signals to others that wrongdoing matters morally.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.