Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Armstrong's immanent universals can be wholly present at ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The argument from supersubstantivalism supports No Interpenetration only for material objects, not for entities of any kind

    Armstrong's immanent universals can be wholly present at multiple spatially discontinuous locations simultaneously, a feature incompatible with the region-identity central to supersubstantivalism.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Armstrong
    # Armstrong Armstrong most commonly refers to **Neil Armstrong** (1930-2012), an American astronaut and aeronautical engineer who became the first human to walk on the Moon on July 20, 1969. He is remembered as a pioneering explorer whose famous words—"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"—marked humanity's first footsteps on another celestial body. Armstrong's achievement remains one of the most significant moments in human history and symbolizes the height of space exploration and scientific achievement.
    Immanent universals(Contrasted with transcendent or Platonic universals; targeted by the No Interpenetration argument)
    Universals that are wholly present at each of their instances and thus spatiotemporally located
    incompatible(as used to describe conflicting demands or responsibilities)
    Unable to exist or work together at the same time; conflicting with each other.
    region-identity(A core principle of supersubstantivalism that conflicts with Armstrong's theory)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    The idea that something can only be identified with or located in one specific place or region of space.
    spatially discontinuous locations(The statement asks whether the same property can exist in completely separated places at once)
    Different places that are completely separated from each other—imagine two objects on opposite sides of the room that aren't connected.
    supersubstantivalism(Used to argue for the restricted version of No Interpenetration)
    The view under which material objects are identified with or essentially tied to spatial regions, such that disjoint material objects cannot share exact locations
    wholly present(Described as the implicit rationale behind ordinary concepts of objects, contrasted with the perdurantist view that objects have temporal parts.)
    An object is wholly present at a time if the entire object, not merely a temporal stage or part of it, exists at that time.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    The argument from supersubstantivalism supports No Interpenetration only for mat...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective