Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Armstrong's partial identity account cannot recover the full dense ordering of lengths without presupposing the real number structure it purports to explain.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Partial identity accounts need not derive reals from pure identity; they can posit primitive ordering relations independently defensible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The charge of presupposition conflates requiring structure with presupposing real numbers specifically—intermediate frameworks exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Dense orderings are achievable through iterated divisibility and comparative relations without invoking full real number arithmetic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Partial identity only generates discrete similarity classes, not the continuum structure needed for dense ordering of all lengths.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Any attempt to derive real number properties from finite identity relations requires smuggling in limiting processes or cardinality assumptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Armstrong's account lacks resources to distinguish between rationally comparable and incommensurable lengths without prior metric structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.