Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Arts that employ natural signs are limited in what they can express
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Natural signs can trigger cross-modal associations, as Herder argued in 'Sculpture' (1778): touch and vision share expressive content through embodied experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If natural signs activate overlapping sensory memories, a single medium can evoke the phenomenal qualities of multiple senses, expanding rather than limiting expressive range.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Lessing's own analysis of the Laocoön concedes that poetry can evoke visual imagery through temporal sequencing of descriptive signs, suggesting natural signs admit of medium-transcending use.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If natural signs can be combined sequentially or metaphorically to construct absent sensory content, the expressive limit belongs to the artist's technique, not to natural signification itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Natural signs are tied to specific sensory modes
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Each art form can only employ the natural signs accessible through its particular sensory medium
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.