Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Asserting that a mental state with the right content can ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Asserting that a mental state with the right content can be a good reason for acting is not a genuine response to Dancy's argument.

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Such an assertion does not explain how we can ever act for a good (normative) reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It amounts to a refusal to engage with Dancy's argument rather than addressing it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    It amounts to a refusal to engage with Dancy's argument rather than addressing i...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Such an assertion does not explain how we can ever act for a good (normative) re...

    Similar

    Williams' argument connects reasons to all psychological states releva...78%Akrasia (acting against one's better judgment) is possible because som...78%Motivating reasons are the contents of mental states, not mental state...78%Othello's reasoning concerns facts about the world rather than his men...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: reasons-just-vs-expl
    View source passageHide passage
    Dancy (2000: 106ff.) considers a possible response: that acting for a good reason may simply require your motivating reason to be a mental state whose content is a good reason. So, you act for a good reason if your motivating reason for, say, taking your umbrella is your believing that it is raining, which is a mental state whose content—“it is raining”—is a good reason to take your umbrella. The success of this response to Dancy’s argument is unclear. On the one hand, if the response is that th
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit