Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Asymmetric dependence requires numerical distinctness between relata, which the doctrine of divine simplicity explicitly denies.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Asymmetric dependence may require only conceptual or logical distinctness, not numerical distinctness—these are separable notions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Divine simplicity defenders argue God's properties are identical-without-distinction, allowing asymmetry despite lack of numerical multiplicity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The argument conflates dependence relations with the ontological status of relata; identity doesn't entail symmetric dependence relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Asymmetric dependence (A depends on B, but not vice versa) logically requires A and B to be distinct entities with different modal profiles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Divine simplicity entails God's identity with all His attributes, making numerical distinctness between God and His properties impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God and creation are not numerically distinct, creation cannot asymmetrically depend on God without God equally depending on creation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.