Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    At level i=1, V^1 characterizes FP via Σ^B_1-definability — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A function f(x) is in FP if and only if it is definable by a Σ^B_1-formula relative to which it is provably total in V^1

    At level i=1, V^1 characterizes FP via Σ^B_1-definability

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A function f(x) is in FP if and only if it is definable by a Σ^B_1-formula relat...The second-order theories V^i introduced by Zambella (1996) characterize levels ...

    Similar

    If there exists i such that T^i_2 = S^{i+1}_2, the corresponding level...75%At level i=1, the corresponding complexity class is P (polynomial time...74%Σ^B₁-definability in V¹ captures exactly the polynomial-time computabl...73%The Polynomial Hierarchy does not collapse to any finite level (Σ^P_k ...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    We define the class \(\mathcal{F}\) of functions definable by limited recursion on notation to be the least class containing \(\mathcal{F}_0\) and closed under composition and the foregoing scheme. 4 (Cobham 1965; Rose 1984) \(f(\vec{x}) \in \textbf{FP}\) if and only if \(f(\vec{x}) \in \mathcal{F}\). 4 is significant because it provides another machine-independent characterization of an important complexity class. Recall, however, that Cobham was working at a time when the mathematical status

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective