Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Atoms are inadmissible as real entities. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Atoms are inadmissible as real entities.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Indivisibility is an essential characteristic of being an atom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Unity is an essential characteristic of being a whole or composite.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Both the unity of composites and the indivisibility of atoms are rejected by Yogācāra analysis.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Related

    Both the unity of composites and the indivisibility of atoms are rejected by Yog...Indivisibility is an essential characteristic of being an atom.Unity is an essential characteristic of being a whole or composite.When the defining essential characteristic of an entity is rejected, that entity...

    Similar

    Definitions are not empirically falsifiable.78%Appearance is not unreal in the sense of being an illusion.78%There is a defeasible argument for realism about an unobservable entit...76%Non-existing entities can be consciously apprehended75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: twotruths-india
    View source passageHide passage
    Since unity is an essential characteristic of being the whole, or composite whereas indivisibility an essential characteristic of being an atom when both the unity and individuality of the atoms are rejected, then the whole and indivisible atoms are no longer admissible. Therefore, Vasubandhu sums up the Yogācāra objections against the reality of the external sense-objects (āyatanas) as: “An external sense-object is unreal because it cannot be the intentional object of cognition either as (1) a
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit