Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Augustine's argument presupposes a Platonic hierarchy of being that is itself a contested metaphysical posit, not a neutral premise.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Using philosophical frameworks to articulate doctrine does not make those frameworks 'presuppositions' rather than tools of exposition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Augustine's core claims about God's transcendence and creation are defensible without commitment to Platonic ontology specifically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Calling any foundational claim 'contested' does not show it was unwarranted as a premise at the time of Augustine's writing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Augustine explicitly invokes Platonic Forms and the Good as highest reality in Confessions and Against the Academics.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The hierarchy of being (God > immaterial > material) is not logically entailed by Christian doctrine alone and reflects Platonic metaphysics.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Alternative metaphysical frameworks (Aristotelian, process theology) could ground Augustine's theological claims without this hierarchy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.