Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aumann's proof smuggles in a substantive assumption that ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It cannot be common knowledge among A and B at state w that both A and B are substantively rational

    Aumann's proof smuggles in a substantive assumption that players' beliefs are derived from a common prior, which is a stronger condition than common knowledge of rationality alone.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Aumann(game theory and epistemology)
    Robert Aumann is an Israeli-American mathematician and economist who created influential models for understanding how people share knowledge and make agreements, particularly focusing on what groups can know together.
    Common prior(as the shared foundation Aumann's theorem requires)
    Starting beliefs or assumptions that two people share before they gather any new information.
    Derives from / derived from(describing the relationship between beliefs and their source)
    Comes from or originates from something else; in this context, it means the players' beliefs are based on or come out of a common prior.
    Substantive assumption(as used in epistemology and logic)
    A real, meaningful claim that requires proof or evidence—not just a minor detail, but something that actually matters to your argument.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    common knowledge of rationality(Epistemic game theory)
    An epistemic condition in which all players are rational, all players know all players are rational, all players know that all players know all players are rational, and so on ad infinitum
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    It cannot be common knowledge among A and B at state w that both A and B are sub...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective