Aumann's proof smuggles in a substantive assumption that players' beliefs are derived from a common prior, which is a stronger condition than common knowledge of rationality alone.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
common knowledge of rationality(Epistemic game theory)
An epistemic condition in which all players are rational, all players know all players are rational, all players know that all players know all players are rational, and so on ad infinitum
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.