Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Avicenna's own distinction between essence and existence entails that even in a Necessary Existent, existence must be 'added' to essence conceptually.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.In the Necessary Existent, essence just *is* existence—there is nothing 'added,' even conceptually, since the concepts themselves would be identical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Applying the essence-existence distinction universally conflates a valid principle for contingent beings with one inapplicable to necessary being itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Avicenna explicitly states essence and existence are mentally distinct in all beings except God, establishing a universal conceptual principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If existence were intrinsic to essence in the Necessary Existent, the distinction would collapse entirely, undermining Avicenna's metaphysical framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Conceptual distinction (distinctio rationis) doesn't require real separation, allowing essence and existence to differ mentally while remaining identical in reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42