Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Bach and Harnish's Linguistic Communication Model demonst... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A hearer must infer that a cooperative speaker means something different from what the speaker literally said

    Bach and Harnish's Linguistic Communication Model demonstrates that apparent maxim violations are often resolved by recognizing non-standard speech acts, requiring no inference beyond what was literally said.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Bach and Harnish(as the creators of a specific theory about communication)
    Two linguists and philosophers (Kent Bach and Robert Harnish) who studied how language actually works in real conversation, especially when people don't say exactly what they mean.
    Linguistic Communication Model(as a framework for understanding speech)
    A theory that explains the rules and patterns for how people use language to communicate with each other, especially beyond just the dictionary meanings of words.
    Literally said(as the surface-level content of speech)
    The exact words and their plain, dictionary meanings without reading between the lines or assuming hidden meanings.
    Maxim violations(as apparent rule-breaking in speech)
    When someone breaks the unwritten rules of normal conversation—like being unclear, dishonest, irrelevant, or overly wordy—that we usually follow when talking to each other.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Non-standard speech acts(as unconventional uses of language)
    Ways of using language that don't follow the typical pattern, like sarcasm, hints, or indirect requests that still accomplish a real purpose in conversation.
    Speech acts(philosophy of language)
    The idea that saying something is actually doing something—like when you say 'I promise' you're not just making sounds, you're performing the action of promising.
    inference(Nyāya epistemology)
    A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A hearer must infer that a cooperative speaker means something different from wh...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective