Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Batson's experimental results do not give reason to prefe... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Batson's experimental results do not give reason to prefer the empathy-altruism hypothesis over the aversive-arousal reduction hypothesis.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Both the empathy-altruism hypothesis and the aversive-arousal reduction hypothesis (under the modified assumption that high-empathy subjects believe physical escape won't relieve distress) predict that high-empathy subjects will help in both easy and difficult escape conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.When two hypotheses make the same prediction about the same data, that data cannot discriminate between the hypotheses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Both the empathy-altruism hypothesis and the aversive-arousal reduction hypothes...When two hypotheses make the same prediction about the same data, that data cann...

    Similar

    Both the empathy-altruism hypothesis and the aversive-arousal reductio...86%The a priori argument for the strongest form of psychological egoism d...75%Weak altruism can evolve in the absence of donor-recipient correlation...73%Weak altruism can evolve without donor-recipient correlation73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: altruism-empirical
    View source passageHide passage
    There is, however, a problem to be overcome before one concludes that the aversive-arousal reduction hypothesis cannot explain the findings that Batson and his associates have reported. In arguing that Table 4 reflects the predictions made by the aversive-arousal reduction hypothesis, Batson must assume that escape will alleviate the aversive affect in both low & high empathy situations, and that subjects believe this (although the belief may not be readily available to introspection). One
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit