Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Beardsley's trinitarian doctrine (unity, intensity, compl... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The failure of Beardsley's account of aesthetic experience does not mean the notion of the aesthetic should be abandoned.

    Beardsley's trinitarian doctrine (unity, intensity, complexity) cannot be maintained as necessary or sufficient conditions of aesthetic experience.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Inferring that the concept of the aesthetic should be abandoned from the failure...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The failure of Beardsley's account of aesthetic experience does not mean the not...
    The failure of a single account of a concept does not warrant abandoning the con...

    Similar

    Beardsley claimed unity, intensity, and complexity are distinguishing ...78%Moritz concludes that aesthetic judgments cannot be grounded in determ...74%Dissolving aesthetic structures into undifferentiated unity denies the...74%The same reasoning that rules out a discrete religious experience shou...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetic-judgment
    View source passageHide passage
    As noted in Section 2.4, Beardsley claimed, heroically, that aesthetic experience is distinguished by its unity, intensity and complexity. Dickie argued, in reply, that such characteristics were either not plausibly necessary conditions of aesthetic experience, or else that Beardsley’s description of them was inadequate. Part of Dickie’s attack was completely beside the point, since he confused aesthetic experiences with the experiences of works of art; the fact that some experiences of works of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective