Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Beauchamp and Childress's selection of which historical p... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The common morality's norms are universally applicable despite being historically grounded

    Beauchamp and Childress's selection of which historical practices constitute 'common morality' reflects prior normative commitments, making universality an assumption rather than a finding.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    An assumption rather than a finding(as criticism that the theory assumes what it claims to discover)
    Something taken for granted at the start (assumption) rather than something discovered through investigation (finding)—suggesting the conclusion was built in from the beginning.
    Beauchamp and Childress(as cited authorities on medical ethics and public health ethics)
    Two bioethicists (Tom Beauchamp and James Childress) who wrote an influential textbook on medical ethics that established four core principles for making ethical decisions in healthcare: respect for people's choices, doing good, avoiding harm, and treating people fairly.
    common morality(Beauchamp and Childress's bioethical framework)
    A set of moral norms whose authority is established historically through their success in advancing human flourishing across time and place, applied universally rather than relatively
    normative(in ethics and philosophy)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Relating to how things should be or what people ought to do, rather than just describing how things actually are.
    normative commitments(as used in philosophy of science)
    When a theory takes a stance on how things *should* be or what *ought* to happen, rather than just describing how things actually are.
    universality(Distinguishing the nature as such from its mode of universality)
    Not a constitutive mark of the common nature itself, but its unique and inseparable property

    Connections

    2 topics

    Bioethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    The common morality's norms are universally applicable despite being historicall...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective