Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Beauty cannot be a bare property — it must be grounded in... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Beauty cannot be a bare property — it must be grounded in nonaesthetic properties.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Aesthetic properties are inherently 'sociable': they cannot exist without being grounded in nonaesthetic properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Something cannot be merely beautiful without being beautiful in virtue of some nonaesthetic properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Recognizing that aesthetic properties arise from nonaesthetic properties is constitutive of aesthetic thought itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's aesthetic formalism holds that beauty is apprehended through pure disinterested judgment, not derivable from any determinate conceptual or nonaesthetic property.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If beauty were grounded in nonaesthetic properties, aesthetic judgment would collapse into cognitive or teleological judgment, which Kant's third Critique explicitly distinguishes as a category error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The logical independence of the judgment of taste from determinate concepts entails that beauty cannot be constitutively dependent on nonaesthetic properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Moore's open-question argument establishes that any attempt to define a normative property in terms of natural or nonaesthetic properties commits the naturalistic fallacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If beauty were necessarily grounded in nonaesthetic properties, one could always coherently ask 'but is it beautiful?' of any nonaesthetic description, showing the entailment fails.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The persistent open-question about any candidate nonaesthetic base demonstrates that beauty retains irreducible normative autonomy not capturable by supervenience or dependence relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Related

    Aesthetic properties are inherently 'sociable': they cannot exist without being ...If beauty were grounded in nonaesthetic properties, aesthetic judgment would col...If beauty were necessarily grounded in nonaesthetic properties, one could always...Kant's aesthetic formalism holds that beauty is apprehended through pure disinte...
    +5 moreShow less
    Moore's open-question argument establishes that any attempt to define a normativ...Recognizing that aesthetic properties arise from nonaesthetic properties is cons...Something cannot be merely beautiful without being beautiful in virtue of some n...The logical independence of the judgment of taste from determinate concepts enta...The persistent open-question about any candidate nonaesthetic base demonstrates ...

    Similar

    Aesthetic thought cannot coherently treat beauty as a bare property — ...84%Aesthetic properties are inherently 'sociable': they cannot exist with...80%Color thought does not presuppose that colors are grounded in physical...76%Something cannot be merely beautiful without being beautiful in virtue...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aesthetic-judgment
    View source passageHide passage
    This claim is very intuitive, but let us try to say something more in support of it. It seems to be a deep fact about beauty and other aesthetic properties that they are inherently “sociable”; beauty cannot be lonely. Something cannot be barely beautiful; if something is beautiful then it must be in virtue of its nonaesthetic properties. Furthermore, knowing this is a constraint on our judgments about beauty and other aesthetic properties. We cannot just judge that something is beautiful; we mus
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit