Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Beauty is properly speaking a property only of the visual. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The phenomenon of distance in aesthetic response is a specific feature of visual perception, not a general quality of disinterestedness in all aesthetic response.

    Beauty is properly speaking a property only of the visual.

    AestheticsPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsPerception

    Related

    Riedel's characterization of disinterestedness as a general quality of all aesth...The phenomenon of distance in aesthetic response is a specific feature of visual...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Appearances (P-properties) are perceptually basic in visual perception82%Sight is a sense for mere appearance, not reality.80%Matter is mere appearance, not a thing-in-itself.79%In vision, the visible object is visible in itself without requiring a...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    The main thrust of the fourth Grove, building upon Herder’s insistence that aesthetics must employ the methods of both Aristotle and Kames in order to reach Baumgartian conclusions, is that recognition of the distinctions among our senses will explain the variety of both forms of art and forms of aesthetic response. The premise of Herder’s argument is that aesthetic response is not the disinterested reaction of a special internal sense to purely formal properties of objects, but is really the he

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective