Because the argument from design requires projecting the wisdom-power nexus onto a being outside the causal order, the supporting argument's P2 illegitimately extends an intra-experiential concept beyond its constitutive limits.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Causal order(as the framework within which freedom operates): The chain of cause-and-effect that governs events in the physical world, where one thing causes another to happen.
P2(Provides the truth conditions for proposition (7), identified as proposition (7): George Bush does not exist.): The principle that proposition (7) is true if and only if George Bush does not exist — a modalized instance of the Tarski truth-schema 's is true iff s'.
argument from design(Natural theology / philosophy of religion): An argument from analogy that attempts to establish the existence and nature of God by comparing the order found in the universe to the order found in human-made artifacts, concluding both must share an intelligent designer as cause
constitutive limits(as used in epistemology): Boundaries that don't just guide thinking but actually make up or define the very foundations of how knowledge can be built.

Based on where you are in your exploration