Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Being alive is a property an individual may bear on its own, without being capable of Darwinian evolution.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Life is fundamentally a population-level phenomenon; organisms are defined by membership in lineages with reproductive capacity, not intrinsic properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Mayr's biological species concept and Hull's process ontology ground biological categories in historical-causal networks, not individual instantiation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An isolated last dodo lacks the relational properties constitutive of being alive as a biological kind, even if its metabolism continues.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Maturana and Varela's autopoiesis defines life by self-producing organization, which itself presupposes evolutionary origin and cannot be decoupled from Darwinian history.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A system's current autopoietic organization is intelligible only against the background of selective pressures that shaped it, making evolution constitutively relevant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
The compositional account implies that being alive is a property an individual (say the last remaining dodo) may bear on its own.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.