Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Belief-desire psychology, as Nagel argued in 'The Possibi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Motivating reasons are mental states of agents, or facts about those states.

    Belief-desire psychology, as Nagel argued in 'The Possibility of Altruism,' cannot account for cases where agents are motivated by recognized objective requirements without antecedent desires.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Agents often act from recognition of moral duties (e.g., keeping promises) without prior desires motivating such recognition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Belief-desire models struggle to explain why objective requirements themselves generate motivation independent of pre-existing wants.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Nagel's internalism about reasons suggests rational agency requires direct motivational force from recognized normative truths, not desire.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The desire to act morally or rationally can be latent or constitute part of rational agency itself, making the 'no antecedent desire' claim ambiguous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Recognition of objective requirements may causally depend on background desires (e.g., for consistency, approval), which belief-desire psychology accommodates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Nagel's view risks positing a mysterious motivational faculty disconnected from psychological explanation, rather than refining desire-based accounts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Agent (in philosophy)(referring to the players or participants in a game)
    A person, player, or entity that makes decisions and takes actions in a situation.
    Antecedent desires(describing what might be required for moral beliefs to motivate action)
    Desires or wants that already exist before a belief influences you—like wanting approval from friends before a moral belief makes you act.
    Belief-desire psychology(as a theory of human motivation)
    A theory that explains human actions as being caused by two things: what you believe to be true and what you want to happen. For example, if you believe it's raining and you want to stay dry, you'll grab an umbrella.
    Objective requirements(as motivations in ethics)
    Rules or reasons for acting that exist independently of what any individual person wants; things that are right or important whether or not someone desires them. For example, a moral duty to tell the truth is an objective requirement even if you'd prefer to lie.
    The Possibility of Altruism(as a specific work in philosophy)
    A philosophical book by Thomas Nagel that questions whether people can truly act unselfishly—that is, whether we can be motivated to help others for reasons beyond our own wants and desires.
    Thomas Nagel(as the philosopher being referenced)
    An influential American philosopher known for writing about consciousness, ethics, and how we understand ourselves. He published 'The Possibility of Altruism' in 1970 to explore whether we can be genuinely motivated to help others.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Agents often act from recognition of moral duties (e.g., keeping promises) witho...Belief-desire models struggle to explain why objective requirements themselves g...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Motivating reasons are mental states of agents, or facts about those states.
    Nagel's internalism about reasons suggests rational agency requires direct motiv...
    +3 moreShow less
    Nagel's view risks positing a mysterious motivational faculty disconnected from ...Recognition of objective requirements may causally depend on background desires ...The desire to act morally or rationally can be latent or constitute part of rati...