Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Bernoulli's theorem licenses the claim that it is 'usuall... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The final step of the Williams-Stove argument is fallacious

    Bernoulli's theorem licenses the claim that it is 'usually right' (high probability in a frequentist sense) that a small interval around the sample frequency will include the true population frequency

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Bernoulli's theorem(Probability theory; discussed in the context of the Williams-Stove argument for induction)
    A mathematical result licensing the claim that, more often than not, a small interval around the sample frequency will include the true population frequency
    frequentist sense(as used in probability and statistics)
    A way of thinking about probability based on how often something actually happens when you repeat an experiment many times, rather than on personal belief or logic alone.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    licenses the claim(as used in epistemology (the study of knowledge))
    Gives you good enough reason or permission to say or believe something is true based on evidence or logic.
    population frequency(as used in statistics)
    How often something actually happens in the entire group you're interested in studying (everyone or everything, not just the ones you measured).
    sample frequency(as used in statistics)
    How often something happens in the group of people or things you actually tested or measured (as opposed to everyone or everything in general).

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism3 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Being 'usually right' does not imply that for any given sample it is 'highly cre...The final step of the Williams-Stove argument is fallaciousThere exist samples that do not match their populations at all, which is compati...Williams's argument moves from 'usually right' to 'credible on each occasion of ...

    Similar

    Being 'usually right' does not imply that for any given sample it is '...80%Drawing conclusions about the probability of a population frequency gi...78%Given a certain population frequency, the probability of getting diffe...77%Large samples drawn indiscriminately from a population will have frequ...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    The more problematic step in the argument is the final step, which takes us from the claim that samples match their populations with high probability to the claim that having seen a particular sample frequency, the population from which the sample is drawn has frequency close to the sample frequency with high probability. The problem here is a subtle shift in what is meant by “high probability”, which has formed the basis of a common misreading of Bernouilli’s theorem. Hacking (1975: 156–59) put

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective