Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Bertrand Russell's distinction between knowledge by acqua... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Knowledge of an object is not lost when the object ceases to exist, though the nature of that knowledge shifts from predication to causal knowledge.

    Bertrand Russell's distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description entails that causal inference yields only propositional description, not genuine object-knowledge.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Bertrand Russell
    Bertrand Russell was a British philosopher, logician, and social activist (1872-1970) who became famous for trying to show that mathematics could be built from pure logic, and for his clear, witty writing that made complex ideas accessible to everyday readers. He also became a public intellectual who spoke out on major issues like nuclear weapons, religion, and social justice, earning the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950. Today, he's remembered as one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century who believed philosophy should tackle real-world problems, not just abstract puzzles.
    Object-knowledge(as genuine knowledge that causal inference supposedly cannot provide)
    Direct, immediate knowledge of a thing itself, rather than just facts or descriptions about it—knowing the object through direct acquaintance rather than through information.
    Propositional description(as what causal inference produces)
    A statement or claim about something—basically, putting what you know into words or sentences that can be true or false.
    causal inference

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Epistemology of causation)
    A mode of reasoning that goes beyond the evidence of the senses and memory by supposing a connection between present facts and what is inferred from them
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
    knowledge by acquaintance(NE §382; derived from Russell)
    Direct perceptual knowledge of something, as opposed to knowledge mediated by description; used here to characterize how the self knows itself
    knowledge by description(NE §382; derived from Russell)
    Indirect knowledge of something through descriptive content rather than direct perception; contrasted with knowledge by acquaintance

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Knowledge of an object is not lost when the object ceases to exist, though the n...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective