Bhikkhu Bodhi and other philologists argue that the canonical term saññā (Pāli for saṃjñā) consistently denotes recognition-based identification, a cognitively richer act than the mere presence of vijñāna.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Bhikkhu Bodhi(as the main authority cited in this statement): A contemporary Buddhist scholar and monk who studies and interprets ancient Buddhist texts, known for making Buddhist philosophy accessible to modern audiences.
Philologist(describes what Bhikkhu Bodhi and others do when analyzing Buddhist terminology): A scholar who studies the history and meaning of words and languages, especially in ancient texts.
Recognition-based identification(what saññā is argued to mean): The mental act of recognizing something by matching it against memories and categories you've already learned.
Saññā (Pāli) / Saṃjñā (Sanskrit)(the key concept being analyzed in this statement): A Buddhist philosophical term referring to the mental process of recognizing, labeling, and identifying things based on past experience and memory.

Based on where you are in your exploration