Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Biologically plausible models of language-related behavio... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Symbolic representations need not play any role in computational modeling when the goal is to demonstrate human-like performance in a biologically plausible model of language-related behavior

    Biologically plausible models of language-related behavior (such as learning to apply words correctly to perceived objects, judging concept similarity, or assessing sentiment) can be constructed without symbolic representations

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Key Terms

    Biologically plausible(describing models of how language behavior could work)
    Able to work in a way that matches how actual brains and bodies function, rather than being purely theoretical.
    Concept similarity(as an example of language-related behavior)
    How alike two ideas or categories are; for example, judging whether 'apple' and 'orange' are more similar to each other than to 'triangle.'
    Sentiment assessment

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as an example of language-related behavior)
    Determining the emotional tone or feeling expressed in language—whether something is positive, negative, or neutral.
    symbolic representations(Contrasted with imagistic representations in the context of language processing)
    Mental representations that encode content through abstract symbols rather than sensory images; the form posited by representationalist and connectionist accounts of language content.

    Related

    Symbolic representations need not play any role in computational modeling when t...The computational goal in such cases is human-like performance, not symbolic fid...

    Similar

    Symbolic representations need not play any role in computational model...83%If connectionist (non-symbolic) models can perform cognitively interes...79%Cognitively motivated conceptual representations of language are recon...78%Something can be a logical model without being a representational mode...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    On the other hand, if the computational goal is to demonstrate human-like performance in a biologically plausible (or biologically valid!) model of some form of language-related behavior, such as learning to apply words correctly to perceived objects or relationships, or learning to judge concept similarity, or to assess the tone (underlying sentiment) of a discourse segment, then symbolic representations need not play any role in the computational modeling. (However, to the extent that language

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective