Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Blameworthiness requires that an agent possess the capacity to have acted otherwise under the same structural conditions.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The capacity to act otherwise is likely incompatible with causal determinism; requiring it makes most people never blameworthy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Blameworthiness can track moral reasons and character flaws independent of metaphysical freedom; capacity isn't the only relevant factor.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.No empirical test can verify whether an agent possessed this capacity under identical conditions; the criterion is epistemically inaccessible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral responsibility requires freedom; an agent unable to act differently lacks the control necessary for accountability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Our practices of praise and blame presuppose agents could have done otherwise; removing this capacity undermines their justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Punishment is only fair when directed at those who possessed genuine alternatives; otherwise we penalize necessity, not choice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.