Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Boethius and Aquinas argue God exists in eternal simultaneity, perceiving all of time at once rather than foreknowing it sequentially.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Eternal simultaneity is conceptually incoherent: 'seeing all at once' imports temporal language that contradicts timelessness itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God perceives future events as present, those events possess determinate truth-values now, which still seems to necessitate them logically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The doctrine lacks explanatory power for how timeless perception relates to causal processes unfolding sequentially in the actual world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Sequential foreknowledge creates logical contradiction: God would know future free choices before they occur, making them determined rather than free.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Eternal simultaneity preserves both divine omniscience and human freedom by placing God outside temporal succession entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Classical metaphysics requires God's perfection to exclude dependence on time; temporal beings exist in time, but God transcends it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.