Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Bolzano's semantic notion of entailment requires that fro... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Bolzano anticipated Gentzen's Hauptsatz in a certain sense

    Bolzano's semantic notion of entailment requires that from the smallest number of premises the largest number of conclusions follow, none of which has simple components not also contained in the premises

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Bolzano
    Bolzano refers to Bernhard Bolzano (1781–1848), an Austrian mathematician and philosopher who made important discoveries about how functions behave and how infinity works in mathematics. Though his work wasn't widely recognized during his lifetime, he's now considered a pioneer who helped lay the groundwork for modern calculus and logic. His most famous contribution is the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, a fundamental principle in mathematics that helps us understand continuous functions and infinite sequences.
    Conclusions(what you derive from the premises)
    The statements that logically follow from or are supported by the premises in an argument.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Semantic notion of entailment(the core concept being explained)
    A way of understanding how conclusions logically follow from starting statements based on what those statements actually mean, rather than just following formal logical rules.
    Simple components(describing what elements make up a statement's meaning)
    The basic, irreducible parts or building blocks of a statement—like the individual concepts or ideas that make it up.
    entailment(Conceptualist framework)
    Understood in terms of truth at a world
    premises(as used in logic and philosophical arguments)
    Starting statements or assumptions that are used to support a conclusion—like the opening claims in an argument that lead to a final point.

    Related

    Bolzano anticipated Gentzen's Hauptsatz in a certain senseBolzano's and Gentzen's criteria are structurally parallel: both require that in...Gentzen's characterization of normal proofs holds that they do not make a detour...

    Similar

    That entailment is precisely what the Simple View asserts.81%A more restricted notion of entailment (entailment*) should govern inf...80%Degrees of entailment can be construed in terms of entailment probabil...80%Supervenience is not in general sufficient for entailment.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: bolzano
    View source passageHide passage
    The relation of entailment between (sets of) conceptual truths has the characteristic feature that, according to it, from the smallest number of premisses the largest number of conclusions will follow none of which has simple components which are not also contained in its premisses (WL II, 386). Ideas such as these sound akin to Gerhard Gentzen’s characterization of normal proofs: “They do not make a detour. They do not introduce concepts which are not contained in its final result and must ther

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective