Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Bradley's idealist monism in Appearance and Reality argues that relational oppositions are inherently self-contradictory and point beyond themselves to a non-relational Absolute, not to a stipulated synthesis.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Bradley's regress argument equivocates between logical dependence and causal dependence; relata can be independent even if relations require them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Absolute itself appears unintelligible if non-relational—we cannot coherently conceive of properties without any relation to each other or to consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Synthetic constructs successfully explain relational phenomena without positing a transcendent Absolute; Occam's razor favors the parsimonious view.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Relations require relata with independent properties, but this regress is vicious—only a unified Absolute avoids infinite circularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Finite relational facts cannot be wholly self-sufficient; their intelligibility demands grounding in something non-relational and complete.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Experience confirms that contradictions arise when we treat relations as ultimately real—suggesting they are appearances of deeper reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.