Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Bradley's only response to external relations was to insi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Bradley's argument for idealism is fallacious

    Bradley's only response to external relations was to insist they must be grounded in the natures of their terms, which begs the question against the externalist position.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If relations are truly external, their existence seems independent of relata natures, making them metaphysically mysterious and causally inert.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Bradley's internalism avoids this problem by requiring relations to reduce to intrinsic properties, providing a coherent metaphysical foundation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Externalists cannot explain why specific relations hold between specific terms without smuggling in hidden intrinsic grounds anyway.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Demanding all relations ground in natures assumes internalism true, precisely what externalists deny—this is circular, not a refutation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Relations like 'taller than' plausibly depend only on relata heights, not deeper intrinsic natures, supporting genuine externalism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Bradley never shows why grounding relations in natures is metaphysically mandatory rather than merely one coherent option among alternatives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Bradley never shows why grounding relations in natures is metaphysically mandato...Bradley's argument for idealism is fallaciousBradley's internalism avoids this problem by requiring relations to reduce to in...Demanding all relations ground in natures assumes internalism true, precisely wh...
    +3 moreShow less
    Externalists cannot explain why specific relations hold between specific terms w...If relations are truly external, their existence seems independent of relata nat...Relations like 'taller than' plausibly depend only on relata heights, not deeper...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit