Bradley's own regress argument shows that relational diversity within experience generates contradictions, undermining coherence of any experiential system as a model of the Absolute.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Bradley: # Bradley "Bradley" most commonly refers to a person's name rather than a technical term. The most notable historical figure with this name is **F.H. Bradley** (1846-1924), a British philosopher who significantly influenced how people think about truth and reality. His key idea was that truth isn't just about individual facts matching the world, but about how all our beliefs fit together as a coherent whole—a perspective that still shapes modern philosophy today.
Relational diversity(what Bradley claims creates problems in experience): The idea that things are different from each other because they have different relationships or connections to other things.
coherence(Applied uniformly by Bosanquet to both religious and non-religious truth claims.): The standard by which truth is assessed — a belief or system of beliefs is true insofar as it forms a consistent, internally unified whole.
regress argument(moral skepticism): An argument for moral skepticism that works generally by criticizing each method proposed for ruling out moral nihilism.
the Absolute(Used in the context of Romantic philosophy as an ultimate but unreachable ideal.): That which can never be fully determined and is pursued through an open-ended, striving commitment.

2 topics