Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Brains do not produce consciousness; rather, brains tap into a pre-existing universal consciousness.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Neural damage, anesthesia, and lesion studies produce precise, predictable alterations in conscious experience that a mere 'diffraction' model cannot explain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If brains only filtered pre-existing consciousness, disrupting the filter should release more consciousness, not eliminate specific capacities like face recognition or language.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The prism analogy presupposes a structural match between the medium and the output, yet Leibniz and Hume both show that no spatial or physical property of a substrate can constitute or entail phenomenal properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Positing universal consciousness as ontologically prior commits the same explanatory debt as physicalism: it assumes rather than explains why any substrate—divine or neural—gives rise to subjective experience at all.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
God is an omnipresent mind coextensive with all of space.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Brains, like everything else, are immersed in this omnipresent universal mind.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Brains naturally diffract the universal consciousness, generating individual streams of experience in the way prisms diffract light.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.