Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Brentano's thesis that all mental states are characterized by intentionality applies paradigmatically to emotions, not merely to accompanying thoughts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Bodily sensations and moods (anxiety, depression) lack clear intentional objects yet are undeniably emotional, challenging Brentano's universality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Emotions can be misdirected or objectless while remaining genuine—grief persists even when its cause was misidentified, questioning whether intentionality is primary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The phenomenological feeling-tone of emotions (warmth, heaviness) seems independent of intentional content, suggesting dual non-reducible components.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Emotions inherently involve directedness toward objects (fear of X, love for Y), making intentionality their defining feature, not incidental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The same emotion can vary fundamentally based on its object—fear of heights differs from fear of failure—showing intentionality is constitutive.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Emotions can be appropriate or inappropriate relative to their objects, a rational evaluation that presupposes intentional content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.