Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Buss's theory S¹₂ also does not prove the totality of the... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The theory S¹₂ + ∃y¬∃z ε(2,y,z) is proof-theoretically consistent

    Buss's theory S¹₂ also does not prove the totality of the exponential function

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    The theory S¹₂ + ∃y¬∃z ε(2,y,z) is proof-theoretically consistent

    Related

    IΔ0 does not prove the totality of the exponential function

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The graph of the exponential function x^y can be defined via a Δ0-formula ε(x,y,...
    The theory S¹₂ + ∃y¬∃z ε(2,y,z) is proof-theoretically consistent

    Similar

    Buss's theory S¹₂ also does not prove the totality of the exponential ...100%Buss's theory S^1_2 also does not prove the totality of the exponentia...99%IΔ0 does not prove the totality of the exponential function96%IΔ₀ does not prove the totality of the exponential function.95%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    The possibility that exponentiation should be understood to play a role in the formulation of strict finitism itself is also suggested by the fact that the particular examples of ‘infeasible numbers’ which have been put forth by Yessenin-Volpin and others have typically employed exponential or iterated exponential notations of the forms such as \(n_1^{{n}_2}\) or \(n_1^{n_2^{n_3}}\). This in turn suggests another reply to the sorties-based argument against strict finitism. 5 allows us to defin

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective