Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Butler and the Scottish common sense tradition distinguis... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The obligatoriness of one's conscience for oneself is not negated by the fact that following a corruptly formed conscience also constitutes acting wrongly.

    Butler and the Scottish common sense tradition distinguish between the authority of conscience as a faculty and the authority of any particular conscientious verdict, grounding obligation in the former alone.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Butler(as a philosopher whose ideas are being discussed)
    Joseph Butler (1692-1752) was an English philosopher and bishop who argued that conscience is the highest moral authority in humans and that we're naturally designed to follow it.
    Conscience as a faculty(as distinguished from individual moral judgments)
    Conscience understood as a built-in mental ability or power that humans have to judge right from wrong, similar to how you have the faculty of sight or hearing.
    Conscientious verdict(as contrasted with the general power of conscience itself)
    A specific moral judgment or decision that your conscience makes in a particular situation—for example, deciding that lying in this case would be wrong.
    Grounding obligation(as the philosophical task being described)
    Establishing what the ultimate source or foundation of our moral duties is—in other words, explaining why we're actually obligated to do something.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Scottish common sense tradition(as a philosophical movement that influenced how we think about conscience)
    A school of philosophy from Scotland (18th-19th centuries) that emphasized trusting our basic intuitions and common sense rather than doubting everything; they believed some things are obviously true without needing proof.
    authority(as another method a physician might use to ensure patients comply with treatment)
    The power or right to make decisions and have others follow them, based on expertise or position. A doctor has authority because of their medical knowledge.
    obligation(Within obligational disputation)
    The respondent's commitment to a specific stance on the case put forward by the opponent, which governs how the respondent must respond to subsequent propositions throughout the disputation.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    The obligatoriness of one's conscience for oneself is not negated by the fact th...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective