Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    By contrast, there could exist through a period of time j... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Substance is the only category of thing that might have only one instance through at least a minimally extended period of time.

    By contrast, there could exist through a period of time just one substance, provided that it was atomic.

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & Mind

    Related

    Any non-instantaneous event will be made of events that are its parts, so there ...Any one property or trope entails the existence of others (e.g., the existence o...Substance is the only category of thing that might have only one instance throug...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The existence of a single substance is demonstrated by a version of th...75%Therefore, partless substances cannot be material atoms but must be so...73%The only coherent alternative is that an object is wholly present at e...72%Mental and physical substances cannot interact because they lack the c...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: substance
    View source passageHide passage
    Whether these objections to the above versions of the independence account can be answered is unclear. Hoffman and Rosenkrantz (1994 and 1997) develop a different, though probably not incompatible, conception of the relative independence of substances compared to other categories. Substance, they say, is the only category of thing that might have only one instance through at least a minimally extended period of time. Thus, for example, there is no possible world that has, in a given period of ti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective