Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    By Hilbert's thesis, the steps of A can be stated in a fi... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Any function representing a valid mathematical calculation is recursive

    By Hilbert's thesis, the steps of A can be stated in a first-order language, so the premises and conclusion of A can be stated in such a language

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Any function representing a valid mathematical calculation is recursiveBy the completeness theorem, there is a formal derivation of the conclusion of A...Let A be a valid mathematical argument that is a calculation, where one is compu...The existence of such a formal derivation implies the function representing the ...

    Similar

    Tarski's original intent was that such a theory would define a truth p...76%Therefore, completeness of a first-order language implies its set of v...75%Reinhold's Elementarphilosophie attempts to derive all results of Kant...75%The argument with premises K={'∀x(Nx→¬Mx0)', 'N0'} and conclusion X='¬...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: church
    View source passageHide passage
    and he assumes that the proof relation is recursive and hence that the provability relation is semirecursive. Thus, the argument runs as follows: (1) Let \(A\) be a valid mathematical argument that is a calculation, “where one is computing a function (say, in the language of arithmetic)”. Then, (2) by Hilbert’s thesis, the steps of \(A\) can be stated in a first order language (and so the premises and conclusion of \(A\) can be stated in such a language). But then (3) by the completeness theorem

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective