Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    By the Necessity of Distinctness (ND), if two objects are... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objects at t'

    By the Necessity of Distinctness (ND), if two objects are distinct at one time, they are distinct at all times at which they exist

    Modality & PossibilityPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityModality & Possibility

    Related

    At t, Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objectsBoth Oscar and Oscar− survive the loss of the tail and exist at t'Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objects at t'

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    By the Necessity of Distinctness (ND), if two objects are distinct at ...99%By the Necessity of Distinctness (ND), if two things are distinct in s...88%By the Necessity of Identity (NI) / Necessity of Distinctness (ND), ob...87%Let Bill and Bill* be distinct objects that differ in at least one qua...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: identity-relative
    View source passageHide passage
    Oscar and Oscar− both survive Oscar’s loss of a tail. At both \(t\) and \(t'\) Oscar and Oscar− are the same dog, but at \(t\), Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objects. This implies (by ND) that Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objects even at \(t'\) Hence, we must allow that distinct logical objects may occupy the same space at the same time. This is not a problem, however. For although Oscar and Oscar− are distinct logical objects at \(t'\), they are physically coincident.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective