Carnap's inductive logic legitimately treats logical truths as having confirmation value 1, establishing that not all a priori constraints on support functions undermine evidential sensitivity.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A method of reasoning that starts with specific observations or evidence and uses them to draw general conclusions, rather than starting with general rules and deriving specifics from them.
Support functions(as the systems being constrained)
Mathematical tools in probability logic that measure how strongly evidence backs up a particular claim or belief.
a priori(Frege treats 'analytic' as entailing 'a priori' for arithmetic.)
Knowable independently of empirical experience; here treated as a consequence of analyticity.
logical truths
Truths that hold in any domain, regardless of subject matter