Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Cartesian reciprocity of transfer applies the relational ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Cartesian reciprocity of transfer does not satisfy strict relationism in all cases, only for bodies actually undergoing translation.

    Cartesian reciprocity of transfer applies the relational framework precisely where kinematic content exists—namely, during actual translation—leaving quiescent bodies outside the transfer rule's domain without positing absolute rest.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cartesian
    # Cartesian "Cartesian" refers to a system of organizing space using perpendicular lines or axes (usually labeled x, y, and z) that intersect at a point called the origin, allowing you to pinpoint any location using numbers called coordinates. The term comes from René Descartes, a 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician who developed this method as a way to bridge geometry and algebra. You use it every day without thinking about it—GPS coordinates, video game graphics, and even spreadsheet cells all rely on this Cartesian coordinate system.
    Kinematic content(as used to identify when the transfer rule applies)
    Information or properties related to motion and movement, as opposed to things that are stationary.
    Quiescent(as used to describe 'quiescent bodies' that are excluded from the transfer rule)
    In a state of rest or stillness; not moving.
    Relational framework(as an alternative to a unified spatio-temporal manifold)
    A system for understanding things based on how they relate to and depend on each other, rather than treating them as separate and independent.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    absolute rest(philosophy of space and motion)
    A state of a body that requires it to maintain a fixed position relative to some body that is itself at absolute rest; equivalently, a state for which one seeks necessary and sufficient conditions
    domain(Both f1 and f2 have the reals as their domain)
    The set of input values over which a function is defined.
    reciprocity(Condition for full intersubjective communion in disponibilité.)
    The mutual presence of availability in both parties of an intersubjective relationship, necessary for the relationship to fully realize itself though it cannot be demanded.
    transfer(Groves-Clarke mechanism)
    A payment made to a participant under the Groves-Clarke mechanism when the public good is produced despite the participant having a negative valuation, compensating the participant for the externality imposed on them.
    translation(Cartesian relational motion; Pr II 30)
    The motion of a body relative to its neighboring bodies, i.e., a change of contiguous neighborhood.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Cartesian reciprocity of transfer does not satisfy strict relationism in all cas...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective