Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Cases such as moonlighting proteins and intrinsically uns... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Developments in protein science do not undermine the fundamental role of structure in protein classification, but instead call for a more nuanced understanding of that role.

    Cases such as moonlighting proteins and intrinsically unstructured proteins complicate but do not eliminate the structural basis of protein identity.

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A more nuanced account of how structure individuates proteins can accommodate th...Developments in protein science do not undermine the fundamental role of structu...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Developments in protein science do not undermine the fundamental role ...82%Intrinsically unstructured proteins lack a fixed structure yet are fun...81%The path from protein structure to protein function is not straightfor...80%Structure does not play a fundamental individuating role in protein cl...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: natural-kinds
    View source passageHide passage
    Philosophers have also discussed classification at the interface of biology and chemistry. Goodwin (2011) has argued that structure is fundamental and sufficient for classification of biomolecules, such as proteins. Tobin (2010a) and Slater (2009) appeal to developments in the relationship between protein structure and function in a number of cases such as moonlighting proteins, intrinsically unstructured proteins, and enzymes with multiple structural variants. They claim that the path from stru

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective