Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Cassam and Peacocke have developed transcendental argumen... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Stroud's objection to transcendental arguments is not limited to the specific cases proposed by Strawson and Shoemaker, but holds broadly across transcendental arguments.

    Cassam and Peacocke have developed transcendental arguments grounded in the possession conditions for concepts, which sidestep Stroud's gap between our conceptual schemes and external reality.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cassam(as a philosopher developing transcendental arguments)
    Quassim Cassam is a contemporary philosopher who studies how we know things and what makes knowledge possible, particularly focusing on how our minds work.
    Peacocke
    Christopher Peacocke is a British philosopher known for his work on the mind, language, and how we understand the world around us. He's particularly famous for developing theories about mental content—essentially, how our thoughts and beliefs get their meaning—and for arguing that perception plays a crucial role in shaping our concepts. His ideas have been influential in philosophy of mind and philosophy of language, helping shape how contemporary philosophers think about consciousness and understanding.
    Possession conditions for concepts(as the foundation for these transcendental arguments)
    The basic requirements or abilities you need to have in order to understand and use a particular concept—like what you need to know to understand the word 'justice.'
    Stroud's gap(as a problem these arguments aim to avoid)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    A famous philosophical problem (identified by philosopher Barry Stroud) suggesting there's an unbridgeable gap between how our minds organize experience and what the world is actually like independently of our minds.
    conceptual schemes(how culture shapes interpretation of experiences)
    The mental frameworks and categories a person uses to understand and interpret the world around them, shaped by their culture, language, and upbringing.
    transcendental arguments(Epistemology of self-knowledge)
    Arguments that assume the existence of some sort of experience or capacity, then develop insights about the background conditions necessary for that experience or capacity, and finally conclude that those background conditions must in fact be met.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Stroud's objection to transcendental arguments is not limited to the specific ca...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective