Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Categorical desires can be fulfilled posthumously through prior arrangements, making survival instrumentally unnecessary for their satisfaction.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Categorical desires are defined by their intrinsic importance to one's life projects; posthumous outcomes can't sustain this meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without the subject's continued existence to validate arrangements, prior instructions become merely executed commands, not satisfied desires.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The non-identity problem: a deceased person cannot benefit from posthumous events since they lack the continuity to be benefited.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Desire satisfaction requires only that desired outcomes occur, not that the desirer experiences them occurring.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
People routinely fulfill others' posthumous wishes through wills and trusts, suggesting desires can be satisfied after death.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If what matters is the desire's fulfillment, not consciousness of it, then death doesn't prevent categorical desire satisfaction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.