Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Causal continuity theories from Grice to Shoemaker ground identity through reliable causal chains, making literal sameness of content defensible even across temporal gaps.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Causal reliability requires specifying what counts as 'the same chain'—but this specification already presupposes the identity notion it purports to ground.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Twin Earth cases show content depends on external environment, not internal causal chains, undermining the sufficiency of causal continuity alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Gradual causal drift allows content to shift continuously without breaking causal chains, suggesting chains track change rather than establishing sameness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Reliable causal chains preserve functional roles: if a mental state reliably causally connects to the same inputs/outputs over time, it constitutes the same content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Temporal gaps don't break identity in physics (e.g., particles); why should they for mental content if causal relations remain structurally intact?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without causal continuity grounding identity, content becomes purely intrinsic, making meaning unavailable to physical systems entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.